2096 Warnings

by | Culture

Culture

The Warnings Hidden Inside My 2096 World

A warning buried deep enough becomes a world. A world rendered honestly enough becomes a warning. The two are not different things. They are the same thing, approached from opposite directions, meeting somewhere in the middle of a very good story.

The cautionary tradition in speculative fiction is as old as the genre itself — older, really, if you count the myths and the fables and every story ever told about a person who flew too close to something that burned. But the best cautionary fiction does not announce its warnings the way a lecture announces its thesis. It hides them. It embeds them in the texture of daily life, in the systems that characters navigate without commentary because the characters have never known anything else, in the beauty and the brutality of a world that is simply, terribly, what it is.

The world of Shards of a Shattered Sky contains warnings. Significant ones. I want to name them directly here — not because the fiction requires explanation, but because we are living inside their origins right now, and the naming might be useful.

The Warning of Incremental Surrender

The first and most fundamental warning in the world of 2096 is about the nature of surrender itself: that it almost never arrives as a single, dramatic, resistible moment. It arrives as an accumulation of small acceptances, each one reasonable in isolation, each one eroding something that cannot be fully named until it is gone.

The surveillance architecture of 2096 was not imposed. It was purchased — convenience by convenience, feature by feature, terms-of-service dialogue box by terms-of-service dialogue box, across three generations who made individually rational decisions that were collectively catastrophic. The geolocation data extracted from vehicles and sold to insurers without meaningful consent, documented by the FTC in its 2025 action against General Motors and OnStar, was not a scandal that changed anything. It was a Tuesday. It was the kind of thing that prompted three days of news coverage and then receded into the ambient background noise of a world that had learned to absorb such revelations without meaningfully responding to them.

By 2096, privacy as the twentieth century understood it — the protected interior space of a life, the right to an unobserved self, the assumption that thought was sovereign and unmonitored — has been replaced by a spectrum of privacy tiers that track every other inequality in the world with merciless fidelity. The wealthy purchase it. The poor surrender it as the price of participation in a society they cannot opt out of.

The warning is not about technology. It is about attention. About the cultivated human habit of accommodating each individual imposition because the alternative — to refuse, to resist, to demand the systemic reform that no single imposition quite justifies on its own — requires a kind of sustained moral alertness that is exhausting to maintain and easy to abandon.

The warning is not about technology. It is about attention — the cultivated human habit of accommodating each individual imposition because resistance requires the kind of sustained moral alertness that is exhausting to maintain and easy to abandon.

The Warning of Comfortable Ignorance

The second warning lives inside the literacy data, and it is more disturbing, in some ways, than the surveillance story — because it describes not a rights violation but a capacity erosion. The deliberate, funded, sustained erosion of the very cognitive tools that would allow a population to recognize, name, and resist the first warning.

When federal funding for literacy programs falls eighty-two percent in twenty years — from $1.04 billion in 2005 to $190 million in 2024 — the effect is not felt as a policy change. It is felt as a generation of children who grow up without the reading comprehension to understand a lease agreement, a terms-of-service contract, a ballot measure, or a medical consent form. It is felt, decades later, as a population that can be governed through its documents because it cannot read its documents. That is not an accident. Accidents are distributed randomly. This distribution is not random.

The world of 2096 does not need a Ministry of Truth. It does not need censorship bureaus or book burnings or the dramatic machinery of a classically oppressive state. It has something quieter and more durable: a functionally illiterate lower half that signs what it is given to sign and accepts what it is told to accept, not because it has been broken but because it was never given the tools to do otherwise. The corporation, as the Trilogy Note puts it, does not need to oppress an illiterate population. It only needs to write the terms of service.

The world of 2096 does not need censorship or book burnings. It has something quieter and more durable: a population that was never given the tools to read what it signs. The corporation does not need to oppress an illiterate population. It only needs to write the terms of service.

The Warning of the Deferred Reckoning

The third warning is geological in its patience and catastrophic in its eventual expression. It lives inside the water table.

The Ogallala Aquifer underlies eight states and irrigates roughly thirty percent of all groundwater used for American agriculture. The USGS projects sixty-nine percent of its Kansas reserves depleted within fifty years at current extraction rates. The aquifer does not refill on any human timescale. Once it is gone, it is gone in the way that a species is gone, in the way that a language is gone, in the way that a childhood is gone: completely, irreversibly, and with the particular grief of a loss that was foreseeable and was not prevented because the prevention required sacrifice from people who would not bear the full weight of the consequence.

This is the warning of the deferred reckoning: that the costs of today’s choices are not always paid by the people who made them. They are paid by the grandmother who is seventy in 2096, who inherited a desiccated plains and a depleted table and a world of precision agriculture and expensive compensations, none of which quite substitutes for the water that was simply, quietly, used up before she was born.

Climate grief in the world of 2096 is not dramatic. It does not announce itself in the language of crisis. It presents as the chronic, low-grade sorrow of a person who has never seen the thing that was lost and is mourning it anyway — mourning the idea of it, the photographs of it, the stories of it that her grandfather told with a specific catch in his voice that she did not understand until she was old enough to understand that it was guilt.

The costs of today’s choices are not always paid by those who made them. In 2096, the deferred reckoning arrives as inheritance — a world of expensive compensations that do not quite substitute for the water that was used up before anyone living was born.

The Warning of the Body as Ledger

The fourth warning is perhaps the most intimate and the most universally legible, because it is written not in policy documents or aquifer measurements but in flesh. In the specific, measurable, scandalously wide gap between the bodies of the wealthy and the bodies of the poor in 2096 America.

The Lancet’s Ten Americas study documented a life expectancy gap of 20.4 years between the highest and lowest demographic groups in 2021 — and that gap was still widening, still compounding, still translating into the brutal arithmetic of years-of-life-not-lived that no rhetorical abstraction about inequality quite captures the way the number does. Twenty years. The difference between a person who lives to ninety-two and a person who lives to seventy-two, sorted by the economic conditions that attended their birth.

In 2096, the wealthy Americans live into their mid-to-late nineties on precision medicine and gene therapy and the elaborate biological maintenance of bodies treated as investments. The poor Americans live into their mid-to-late seventies on delayed care and environmental stress and the accumulated physiological cost of every deferred medical appointment and every chronic condition left unmanaged because management requires resources that are not available.

The warning is about what we choose to treat as inevitable. The gap is not inevitable. It is not a natural phenomenon. It is a policy outcome, compounded across decades, expressed finally in the bodies of people who never chose the conditions that shortened their lives. That is not fate. That is a decision — distributed, diffuse, deniable, and legible in the end in the only language that cannot be argued with: the body’s own arithmetic.

The life expectancy gap is not a natural phenomenon. It is a policy outcome, compounded across decades, expressed finally in the bodies of people who never chose the conditions that shortened their lives. The body is the final ledger. It cannot be argued with.

The Warning of the Vanishing Interior

The fifth warning is the one I find most difficult to name without sounding melodramatic, so let me try to name it precisely: it is the warning about what happens to the self when the self is perpetually observed.

Pew Research documented in 2023 that eighty-one percent of American adults already felt that data collected about them would be used in ways they were not comfortable with. Seventy percent expressed little to no trust in companies to make responsible decisions about their information. These numbers describe not paranoia but perception — an accurate, documented perception that the interior life of the individual is under sustained observation by systems with commercial interests in its contents.

By 2096, a generation has grown up inside total informational transparency. They have never known what it felt like to be unobserved. They have never experienced the specific freedom of a thought that no system was positioned to harvest. The neural data protections that Colorado and California were scrambling to legislate in 2024 — because brain-computer interfaces were already commercially available and the question of who owned the electrical patterns of thought had not yet been answered — arrived too late and too narrowly to prevent the architecture of cognitive surveillance from becoming, for the bottom economic tier, simply another ambient feature of the world.

What the warning names is the relationship between observation and selfhood. Between the unmonitored interior and the capacity for genuine resistance. Between the private thought and the political act. A population that has never experienced an unobserved self does not know what it has lost. It cannot grieve the absence of something it cannot remember. And a population that cannot grieve a loss cannot organize around recovering it.

What the warning names is the relationship between observation and selfhood. A population that has never experienced an unobserved self cannot grieve its absence. A population that cannot grieve a loss cannot organize around recovering it.

Why the Warnings Are Hidden

I said at the outset that the warnings in the world of 2096 are hidden. It is worth saying, at the close, why they are hidden — why a novelist writing a cautionary work about the present would choose to embed the caution in the texture of a future world rather than announcing it directly.

The answer is not evasion. It is not timidity. It is a calculated bet on the particular power of the oblique approach.

A direct warning can be argued with, dismissed, filed under political opinion and set aside. A world that a reader has inhabited for three hundred pages cannot be argued with in the same way. The reader who has walked the depleted plains of 2096 with a character who has never seen rain fall the way rain used to fall carries the aquifer data in their body, not just their intellect. The reader who has lived inside a character’s bewilderment at the concept of an unobserved thought understands the surveillance architecture not as a policy problem but as a human loss.

Fiction makes the abstract visceral. It makes the statistical personal. It makes the projected present-tense. That is not a trick or a decoration. That is the specific and irreplaceable service that literature performs in the conversation about who we are and what we are building and what, if we are paying attention, we might still choose to become.

The warnings are hidden because that is where they are strongest. Find them. Carry them home. Do with them what you will.

 

 

Sources Cited:

The documented trajectories that underlie each of the five warnings described above. Sources are grouped by the domain they inform.

Surveillance, Privacy, and the Architecture of Observation

Literacy and the Erosion of Cognitive Capacity

Water, Climate, and the Deferred Reckoning

Health, the Body, and the Inequality Ledger

Cautionary Fiction, the Dystopian Tradition, and the Role of Literature

 

Read the Full United States of 2096 Series — 16 Posts